top of page

Strategy vs. Plan: Understanding the Core of Change Management

Change management is critical for any successful business transformation, and two terms often come up: Change Strategy and Change Plan. While closely related, they serve distinctly different purposes and are created at different stages of the change journey.


Change Strategy: The 'Why' and 'How' of Your Approach


The Change Strategy is a high-level, foundational document. It is developed early in the process and focuses on defining the most suitable approach to manage the human and organisational aspects of the transition.


  • Focus: Determining the philosophy and general methodology for change given the organisational context.

  • Key Contents:

    • Context and Rationale: The core reasons for the change and the overall vision.

    • Stakeholder Landscape: Analysis of key groups, their impact, and their needs.

    • Risk Assessment: Identification of people-related risks (e.g., resistance, skill gaps) and mitigation themes.

    • Strategic Approach: Describing the overall methodology (e.g., a phased rollout, a deep involvement model, a particular communication style) based on the environment and culture.

    • Governance and Structure: How the change effort will be organised and overseen.

    An architect working on a house plan illustrates how the Change Strategy is similar to a blueprint of a construction

    The Change Strategy is like the blueprint and executive summary for building a house. It confirms the type of house, the land conditions, and the overall construction approach before the detailed scheduling begins.


Change Plan: The 'What,' 'Who,' and 'When' of Execution


The Change Plan can be one large document or, more practically, a collection of detailed plans that translates the strategy into concrete, actionable steps. It details the specific activities required to move the business from "ready for change" to "adopting change."


  • Focus: Detailing the specific actions, timelines, responsibilities, and resources for change activities.

  • Key Contents (often multiple sub-plans):

    • Communication Plan: Specific messages, channels, and delivery schedules.

    • Training Plan: Curriculum, delivery methods, and training schedules for different user groups.

    • Engagement Plan or Sponsorship Roadmap: Specific actions and expectations for leadership and managers.

    • Resistance Management Plan: Specific interventions for identified points of resistance.

    • Measurement Plan: Metrics and activities to track adoption and sustainment.


Building workers are meeting onsite with detailed construction plans illustrating that a Change Plan is similar to a detailed project schedule

To continue the building analogy, the Change Plan is the detailed project schedule and the task list—specifying exactly when the plumber will be on-site, who buys the fixtures, and the specific date the roofers arrive.

Feature

Change Strategy

Change Plan

Purpose

Defines the approach and rationale.

Details the actions and schedule.

Timing

Early in the change lifecycle.

Developed after strategy, throughout execution.

Scope

High-level, broad, and conceptual.

Detailed, tactical, and task-oriented.

Output

A guiding framework and rationale.

Specific deliverables (e.g., training modules, communication drafts).


Change Strategy vs Change Plan: Do Organisations Need Both?


In almost every scenario, the answer is a resounding yes, organisations need both a Change Strategy and a Change Plan. They are mutually dependent and essential for success:


  1. The Strategy Informs the Plan: Without a solid strategy that analyses the stakeholder landscape and risks, the plan risks being generic, irrelevant, and ineffective. For example, a strategy that identifies high employee skepticism will lead to a plan with more high-touch, face-to-face communication, rather than a plan reliant on impersonal emails.


  2. The Plan Executes the Strategy: A brilliant strategy is useless without the detailed steps in the plan to bring it to life. The plan ensures accountability, resource allocation, and timely execution of the strategic vision.


When They Might Not Be Separate Documents


While the functions of strategy and planning are always required, they may not exist as two distinct, separately titled documents in the following cases:


  • Small, Incremental Changes: For a very small, simple, or highly localised change (e.g., updating a specific software feature for a single team), the strategic decisions and the tactical plan might be merged into a single, concise document. The inherent risks and complexity don't warrant separate documentation.


  • Agile Environments: In highly Agile or iterative projects, the initial change strategy may be brief, focusing on the cultural and environmental context. The "plan" is then broken down into short, rolling waves of planning integrated directly into the project sprints. The strategy becomes a set of principles that guide continuous, smaller-scale planning, rather than one monolithic plan.


A team is engaged in detailed planning to win a sporting game, while they sit overlooking the playing field

A successful change effort needs the strategic vision to understand the playing field and the detailed plan to win the game. While the documentation may merge in smaller projects, the core thinking behind a suitable approach (Strategy) must always precede and inform the specific actions (Plan).


To discuss your specific change planning needs, book a discovery call with Agencia Change:


Agencia Change Briefing Session
Plan only
1h
Book Now

Comments


bottom of page